Just finished this book from David Gibson recently. This book has been sitting on my bookshelf for quite a while (few years, to be precise), it was a gift from my friend and now only I realised that I have not flipped through it. I am a book nerd and I read a lot, so it puzzled me why it took me so long to actually pick up this book and start reading. And my guess would be because of the book’s title. I’m not a fan of rules in photography, and I don’t think there should be any “manual” that details out the “standard operating procedure” as a photographer, be it street, commercial, landscape, wedding and so on.
Anyway, I must admit I was deceived by the book’s title. This book is nowhere near a “manual”. David shared his view on street photography in the introduction section, together with the history and how it has evolved with times. Besides that, there’s a collection of profile and works of street photographers, from the well known to the least known. He also shared some ideas, topics, subjects and projects that one could embark on, or be inspired enough to chart your own path in your photography journey.
I like some of his views about street photography, and how he ended his book by stating the obvious (or maybe not so obvious for some): photography, be it street or others genre, is not something that can be “taught”. One can give guidance or inspiration to another, but at the end of the day, photography can only be “self-taught”. One needs to go and experience, to try and to fail, there is no shortcut in learning and practicing photography.
For those who enjoy and celebrate street photography, this is a nice book for you to read.
I have shared before in this blog that one of the YouTube channels that I’m currently following is the one from Thomas Heaton, a landscape photographer based in England. I enjoyed watching his videos and works not because he shoots epic landscape photographs (which he does), but the part of him that draws me the most are his sincerity, genuineness, and perhaps, frankness. Following his journey in photography often reminds me of my past, the struggles, the excitements, the burned out, the ups and downs, and this is indeed the truth behind photography, the ugly side of things that not often shown to others.
While I don’t love every single images from him, I do enjoy viewing most of his works and photographs. Therefore, when he announced the release of his personal photobook (it was quite a while back), I decided to chip in my support and bought a copy. I was among the first batch to receive his book, and I must say I really enjoyed reading his book. There isn’t a specific theme to the book, it is more like a collection of his best landscape works in one book, together with the “behind the scene” story leading to each shot. There are links to his YouTube video (for some photos) as well if you would like to see him in action.
One of my favourite photos from Thomas was the shot of frosted tree titled “Star of the Show”, I really like the colour palette, the mood and the atmosphere that the photo brought out. His collection includes photos of grand vista, epic locations such as Patagonia and Namibia Dessert, as well as almost-macro-level detail shots of fallen leaves and patterns from the least prominent locations.
If you are a fan of this photos, this book will not disappoint. If not, you can always start from his YouTube channel to get to know him a little more. Till then.
Following up from my previous post on ultra wide monitor, here are some common questions that one may faced when deciding whether to go for ultra wide or not. I’ll try my best to answer them based on my understanding and knowledge.
Will it be difficult to navigate your mouse from one edge to the other?
No, not really. But I guess it depends on your pointer speed and how accurate your mouse is. I always set my pointer speed to very fast speed so I don’t see any problem, delay or slow reaction in moving my mouse from one end to the other.
Does it require high graphic performance on my PC?
Not exactly, but that very much depends on the specification and what you are pushing it to do. For standard refresh rate and native resolution, even my 5 years old company laptop which runs on Intel 6th gen i5 CPU with internal graphic can drive the display without issue. If you are pushing more pixels, higher refresh rate, use it for gaming and so on, I believe you will need a discrete GPU to drive those pixels.
Is 29” too small to be useful?
It really depends on what you use it for and your distance from the screen. If you are not sitting too far away and you usually only need to run 2 programs at the same time, then I would say 29″ is just nice. If you have a deep desk or you prefer to run 3 or more programs at the same time, then getting something with 34″ or higher would be more suitable.
I can’t imagine how will the monitor and aspect ratio be like…
It certainly is not easy to imagine. One good way to start is to compare to your current monitor. I found this website useful in giving me an idea what the 21:9 monitor will be like if it was a 16:9 monitor instead. From there, I roughly estimated that a 29 inch 21:9 monitor will have similar screen height as a 23 inch monitor, which is something close to my office’s monitor, and I’m comfortable with this screen height, so 29 inch ultra wide should do the job for me.
21:9 or 32:9?
There’s another breed of wide display dubbed Super Ultra Wide that has aspect ratio of 32:9, which is basically two monitors built as one. They are even wider, gives you even more screen estate, can run 4 programs or more side by side. I have not used one before, but I did saw some users mentioned about the quirks with that resolution as it is not commonly supported. Anyway, no comment. 21:9 is good enough for me at the moment.
Full HD or higher resolution?
This is pretty subjective. For me, I use this for my work purpose only, thus 2560×1080 resolution is good enough for my use. If you do the math it is around 96PPI, which is no where near the density of some of the higher end screen out there. If I work from a distance, I will not noticed the pixel, but I do aware that it is not as sharp (I’m spoilt by my iMac’s screen anyway). So if you need sharper screen, you’ll need to step up to 3440×1440 resolution. You can use this website to estimate at what distance your eyes will not be able to differentiate the individual pixels.
Flat or curve?
Now, this is an interesting topic of discussion. I have not used a curve screen long enough to provide judgement on whether it is better than a flat screen. I guess the merits of curve screen is to provide you with more immersion on your media and at the same time avoiding some glare on the glossy screen. For me, currently I don’t see a need to go curve when using my 29” matte screen, it is very useable as it is. But if you are going for larger screen such as 34”, perhaps it makes sense to go curve… anyway, I’ll reserve my judgement and suggestion for now on this topic.
And that’s about it for now. If there are any other thoughts few months down the road, I’ll share again with everyone. Till then.
As you may or may not aware, Singapore was under “circuit breaker” period for the past months. Similar to lockdown imposed around the world, everyone needs to stay home as much as possible, limiting their contact and exposure to others in order to curb the spread of virus. Like everyone else, I was forced to work from home. My daily work involves juggling between 2 to 3 super long excel sheets and a few power point slides at the same time, and doing that on a 13 inch laptop screen is tougher than mission impossible. I do have a 22 inch Full HD monitor borrowed from office for this period. Although it does help a little, but there are many issues that I ran into with the dual screen setup of monitor + laptop screen.
To put it simple, Windows is just poor in managing screens. That’s what I summed up from my experience thus far. Connecting the monitor, setting it as primary display, yet time and time windows and programs will open itself on the secondary screen instead. Although it is possible to work on this setup, the hiccups and the occasional quirks have hindered productivity. Something needs to be done. I could add another external monitor and stop using my laptop screen, but that will not solve the issue of windows opening randomly on any monitor it wished. After long consideration, I figured that I need to use a one monitor setup. Large high resolution screen came to mind, but considering Windows is so sucks in managing screen scaling, it would still be problematic and I may not be able to really improve my workflow. Hence, came the idea of trying out an ultra wide monitor.
Watching movie in its native 2.35:1 aspect ratio
My aim is to connect my laptop to only one display, and this display should allow me to have a good multi-tasking workflow. I don’t need ultra high resolution screen for my work, as long as I can read the text and graphics I’m okay to see some pixels (anything equivalent to what my current loan monitor will be good enough). After searching high and low, I decided to settle with the LG 29WN600-W. The basic specifications that I bothered for this monitor are as follow:
Screen size: 29 inch
Resolution: 2560 x 1080
Aspect ratio: 21:9
Brightness: 250 nits
Color accuracy: Calibrated, 99% SRGB
Display type: IPS, matte coated
Built-in speaker: 7W x 2
Security: Kensington lock compatible
That’s about it! It does have other gamer centric features, HDR10 support and so on which are not of my concern. All in all, this is a very basic monitor with ultra wide aspect ratio of 21:9, which is around 33% more screen estate than a regular 16:9 Full HD monitor. Reading the specification and looking at the monitor itself shows how “basic” it really is. For example, there’s no height adjustment and swivel on the monitor stand, it doesn’t come with USB-C connectivity, there’s no downstream USB port and the list goes on. But still, I decided to purchase this monitor for a few reasons. It is one of the affordable monitor that grant me access to 21:9 aspect ratio and its feature set meets my need for office use. I’m saying this because if you are willing to pay more, there are much better options out there with much better feature set. If you are interested with this monitor, or you would like to know more about 21:9, feel free to read on.
Multitasking at work
Let’s get the downside out of the way first. Other than those missing features mentioned earlier (which is to be expected for monitor at this price point and not a deal breaker), the complaints I have with this monitor are:
If you are close to the screen or viewing the screen from a steep angle, you may notice the left and right edge of the screen tears a little. Perhaps because the panel is not laminated, or maybe the matte coating, or for whatever reasons, but it is not noticeable as long as you maintain a normal viewing distance from the screen.
No cable management included. I guess it won’t add a huge cost to them by just adding a hook or something at the back of the stand in order to run the cable through.
The base of the stand is rather wide, it supports the monitor well without letting it wobble while in use, but it will take up some space on your desk.
The overall height is pretty low, most probably you will need to use vesa mount or a stand to elevate the monitor to your eye level.
After using it for few days I noticed a little bit of discomfort to my eyes. I thought it was due to PWM flickering, but after I checked it seems to be a flicker free panel. Things got better after switching to “Reader Mode”, but after playing around with the settings for a couple of days, seems like the problem has reduced or resolved. This very much depends on individual, so your milage may varies.
And… that’s about it. Yes, I don’t have a lot to complaint overall. In fact, there are a number of surprises that I did not expect the monitor will deliver, such as reasonable sound quality from the built-in speaker and colours are quite accurate out of the box. So in the end, does a 21:9 monitor solved my problem?
After using it for awhile now, I must say yes it did improved my workflow and productivity. Opening two programs side by side with enough space to see the content and work on them is a game changer, something that is hardly doable with my previous screen. And now since I’m running everything on one screen, it has less annoyance and I was able to work through windows by windows easily. However, if you are running programs on fullscreen, it could be overwhelming at times. Excel is okay as I’m able to glance more columns. Website for example are not optimized for such aspect ratio, so there will be a lot of empty spaces lying around.
Lightroom on ultra wide screen
The same goes to programs such as Lightroom. However, other application such as Photoshop and video editing software which allow you to rearrange the adjustment panel would be able to make good use of the extra screen estate. As for movie consumption, 2.35:1 movies will play in native aspect ratio without the black envelop, however 16:9 movies will play with black bar on the sides. For these topics, I guess there are enough materials covered by various youtubers or reviewers, so you can search around and see if ultra wide screen will benefit on your current workflow. Don’t ask me about gaming… I don’t game!
All in all, I’m pretty satisfied with this monitor. I got it at a good discounted price during the recent “work from home” sales, and there is no regret so far. I do noticed there are a few older models from LG that are available through some other retailers, if you plan to save on a few bucks, perhaps you can take a look at those too. Now, this brings me to another thoughts… should I get myself a 21:9 for own personal use? Not now I guess as I’m still rocking my 3 years old iMac (still going strong), but in the future, it is certainly something I would really consider. If you have any question, feel free to ask and I’ll try my best to get back to you. Sorry for the super long review, I’ll do a follow up post to discuss more on the 21:9 aspect ratio in another post. Till then.
I’ve backed the kickstarter project from Shimoda for this Action X series backpack. When the project was successfully funded, founder of Shimoda, Ian Miller gave an update that due to overwhelming response, there could be delays in shipping the bags. Since then, there were quite a bit of hoo haa surrounding the delay and a whole lot of mess generated by some backers. I didn’t receive my pack in December 2019 as promised in the project timeline, but I was lucky enough to get one from the second batch which are delivered in January. Well, it is a kickstarter campaign anyway, therefore I have no issue or whatsoever.
There are already plenty of reviews and features rundown on this bag, so I’m not going to repeat those again. I’ll just be sharing what I like and dislike about this bag, and leave it to you to be the judge whether this is the right bag for you.
What I like:
Nice balance of size and volume for X30 (30-37 litres)
Nice durable materials are used, has a good balance of rigidity and softness
Camera access is on the right side (pun intended), I’m probably the few minorities who wants to access camera from the side panel on the right
Easily removable core unit and divider allowing bag to double as camera or travel bag
Just the right amount of pockets and compartments
Beefy and comfortable top and side handle
Tripod can be strapped on the side or rear
Core unit comes with cover, allowing me to use it separately as camera storage box
Not overly engineered with unnecessary features
Comfortable shoulder strap (need some times to break-in though)
What I don’t like:
Bag is a little heavy when empty
Don’t really like the look of the shoulder strap harness (but they are comfortable to wear)
There are a lot of zippers, and I wish some of the zipper pulls can be lock down in place for a tidier look on the bag
Not a big fan of the look of how the top loader is secured (but it is very functional, nevertheless)
I was contemplating between X30 and X50 during the campaign, worrying that X30 will be too small for my torso length. But X50 is much larger and would be risky to use as carry-on luggage during flight. Furthermore, I do not have that much of gears to pack anyway, so I decided to go with X30 in the end. With maximum torso fit, I’m glad that it fits okay.
This bag is designed for your adventure, for you to go out and explore, and to that extent it does seem to deliver. Of course this is just my initial impression of the bag after using it for my short trips, I still need to use it more often in order to give a full review. If you are interested, you can visit their website to find out more. Till then.
funny bunny photography 